About Vape Reviews
Vape Reviews is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit publication dedicated to public education, consumer safety, and harm reduction.
Through VapeReviews.org, we make evidence-based information about vaping, related products, potential risks, product performance, and the evolving science easier for the public to understand and use.
Who We Are
Vape Reviews is a nonprofit media and educational publication. We cover vaping and related products through independent research, evidence review, product analysis, safety education, explainers, comparisons, industry reporting, and practical resources for the public.
Our work starts with the questions people actually need answered: what a product is, how it works, what evidence supports the claims around it, what risks or limitations deserve attention, how products differ, and what new research or regulatory developments mean in plain language. Product reviews are one part of that work, not the purpose of the organization by themselves.
Our only official website is VapeReviews.org. Where the platform allows it, our official social accounts use @vapereviewsorg. The website is the public home of our educational resources, research, product analysis, policies, corrections, staff information, and official account directory.
Organization Details
- Address
- 6650 Rivers Ave, Charleston, SC 29406
- Phone
- +1 843-996-7780
- Google Plus Code
- WX9C+GR North Charleston, South Carolina
- EIN
- 42-4335137
- DUNS Number
- To be added
Our Editorial Team
Vape Reviews brings together reviewers, researchers, fact checkers, editors, analysts, and operations staff because public-interest coverage of vaping requires more than one kind of expertise. The team verifies claims, evaluates products and evidence, follows safety and regulatory developments, and turns technical information into resources people can actually understand.
Devo Wright
Founder and Editor in Chief
Sets the editorial direction for Vape Reviews and oversees our review standards, coverage priorities, corrections, and publishing decisions.
Amy Chen
Reviewer and Fact Checker
Checks product claims and specifications, reviews source material, and helps make sure our guides say exactly what the evidence supports.
Matt Wong
Relations and Finance
Handles finance and outside relationships while maintaining the line between business arrangements and what the editorial team publishes.
Jordan Ellis
Senior Device Reviewer
Reviews pod systems and starter devices with an emphasis on setup, day-to-day use, controls, maintenance, and the details new buyers notice first.
Sofia Ramirez
Hardware Reviewer
Focuses on the hardware itself: batteries, charging, materials, ergonomics, construction, heat, and how a device holds up through normal use.
Noah Brooks
Compatibility Researcher
Keeps track of pods, coils, replacement parts, product revisions, and compatibility changes that can turn a simple purchase into a confusing one.
Maya Patel
Buying Guide Editor
Builds buying guides and comparisons around the questions people actually ask when they are trying to narrow a category down to a manageable shortlist.
Ethan Miller
Product Tester
Handles extended product use and maintenance testing, looking for the things that only become obvious after a device has been used for a while.
Priya Shah
Fact Checker
Verifies specifications, dates, availability notes, source consistency, and legal or regulatory references before they make it into published coverage.
Caleb Turner
Retail and Pricing Analyst
Tracks what products cost, where they are available, how pricing changes, and whether the value story still makes sense once real-world prices are considered.
Olivia Hart
Flavor and Coil Reviewer
Covers flavor delivery, coil behavior, replacement cadence, consistency, and the tradeoffs that become clearer after repeated use.
Marcus Lee
News and Releases Editor
Follows launches, brand announcements, discontinued products, updates, and category changes so our news coverage stays useful instead of becoming a press-release feed.
Claire Donovan
Editorial Operations Coordinator
Keeps reviews and updates moving through the editorial process, including schedules, correction queues, follow-ups, and the checklists behind publication.
Tessa Kim
Accessories Reviewer
Reviews the accessories around the device—chargers, cases, replacement parts, cleaning tools, and other gear that can make everyday ownership easier or more frustrating.
Our Editorial Mission
Our editorial mission follows the nonprofit mission: make accurate information about vaping and related products easier to understand, place product claims in evidence-based context, and help the public make informed decisions about safety, risk, and use.
That includes independent product analysis, but it also includes the larger picture around the product—charging and battery safety, compatibility, labeling and formulation information, maintenance, research findings, regulatory changes, potential risks, and the limits of what is currently known.
We publish our editorial, fact-checking, corrections, disclosure, and testing policies because evidence-based education works best when readers can see how information was gathered, what was verified, and how we respond when something changes.
How We Approach Reviews
We treat product reviews as a form of public-facing product analysis. We verify specifications where we can, examine how the product works in practice, compare relevant alternatives, document safety and maintenance considerations, and separate manufacturer claims from what the available evidence or testing supports.
The questions change with the product. A charger raises different safety and performance issues than a pod system, disposable device, battery, coil, or accessory. Our framework stays consistent while the evidence and criteria change with the subject.
Published analysis is revisited when the facts change. Product revisions, new safety information, updated research, changing availability, compatibility changes, and better source material can all justify a correction or update.
Our Social Media Presence
Our social accounts are an extension of the publication, not a replacement for it. We use them to share new reviews, explainers, release notes, guide updates, newsroom updates, and shorter pieces of information that make sense on the platform where they appear.
The full article, current correction status, author information, and supporting policies live here on VapeReviews.org. If you find an account claiming to represent Vape Reviews, the easiest way to check it is through our Social page, which lists the profiles we currently recognize as official.
We also pay attention to the questions readers ask on social platforms. Repeated confusion about a product, compatibility issue, price change, or new release can point us toward something worth explaining in more depth on the site.
Legal-Age Audience and Responsible Context
Vape Reviews publishes public-interest information about vaping and related products for adults and for the broader public—including families, educators, journalists, researchers, and others trying to understand the subject. We do not create content to appeal to children or teenagers or to encourage youth vaping.
In the United States, federal Tobacco 21 rules prohibit retailers from selling covered tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, to anyone under 21. Readers are responsible for checking the rules that apply in their own location because age requirements and other restrictions can vary.
Some vape products can contain addictive substances, and vaping can involve health and safety risks. Our role is to make product information, research, risk context, and the evolving science easier to understand. Our educational content does not replace individualized medical advice, product instructions, or the laws that apply where a reader lives.
Educational Purpose
Public education is the center of the organization. Vaping and related products come with technical vocabulary, changing product formats, battery and charging considerations, product formulations, scientific claims, regulatory language, and health or safety questions that can be difficult to sort through without context.
Our explainers, research summaries, product analysis, safety resources, and guides are designed to make that information understandable. We explain what a specification means, how products differ, what evidence supports a claim, what risks or uncertainties are known, and where the science is still evolving.
The goal is informed decision-making. Sometimes that means explaining a product difference; sometimes it means identifying a safety concern, correcting a misleading claim, summarizing research, or showing why a question cannot be answered confidently with the evidence currently available.
Advertising, Affiliate Links, and Independence
A nonprofit publication still has operating costs. Vape Reviews may be supported by donations, grants, advertising, affiliate relationships, sponsorships, and other lawful revenue sources that are compatible with the organization’s mission and policies. Material relationships are disclosed when they matter to the reader’s understanding of the content.
Funding does not purchase an editorial conclusion. A manufacturer, advertiser, donor, sponsor, or affiliate partner does not get to choose our rating, suppress legitimate criticism, control research findings, or approve independent educational coverage.
Our published disclosure, sponsored-sample, ownership-and-funding, editorial, and corrections policies document those boundaries so readers can evaluate the work with the relevant context in front of them.
501(c)(3) Nonprofit Status
Vape Reviews operates as a 501(c)(3) nonprofit publication dedicated to public education, consumer safety, and harm reduction. Independent research, educational resources, product analysis, testing, and public-awareness work are all part of that mission.
The nonprofit structure gives the publication a public-benefit purpose: keep important information accessible, explain evidence in plain language, document safety and compatibility issues, follow the evolving science, and publish conclusions without giving manufacturers or commercial partners control over the editorial result.
Our Nonprofit page explains the mission, programs, governance, research, safety work, and organizational documentation in more detail.
Corrections and Updates
We expect our work to be accurate, but we also know that product information changes and people make mistakes. If you spot a specification that looks wrong, a dead link, an outdated availability note, a policy reference that needs attention, or any other factual problem, send it to us.
A useful correction request includes the page URL, the specific statement in question, and—when possible—the source or information that shows what needs to be reconsidered. We review credible requests and update the page when a correction is warranted.
For larger changes, we may also update the publication date, correction note, methodology, or related pages so the fix is clear rather than quietly changing a sentence and pretending nothing happened.
Contact Vape Reviews
Questions are welcome. Readers can contact us about a review, correction, accessibility issue, account impersonation, media request, legal notice, partnership inquiry, or something on the site that simply needs a human response.
Visit the Contact page and include enough detail for us to understand what you are referring to. A page URL, product name, screenshot, date, or other specific context can save a lot of back-and-forth and help us get the message to the right person.