Feedback on the new review methodology page

The methodology page is a strong addition. The part I found most useful is the separation between measured observations and reviewer judgment.

One suggestion: when full product reviews start publishing, could the review page show a compact “tested by / test period / version tested” block near the top? That would make it easy to connect the methodology to the actual review.

That is the plan. The methodology is the standing framework; individual reviews should identify the product version, test period, reviewer, and the evidence that mattered for that specific conclusion.

I would also like the version identifier near the top because it makes later corrections and product revisions easier to follow.