Comparing two devices with different strengths

A comparison gets more useful when the products are allowed to win in different areas. If one is easier to carry and the other has clearer controls, forcing one universal winner can erase the reason somebody would choose either one.

I prefer to define the decision factors first, then show which product is stronger for each factor and who that difference is likely to matter to.

This is why I like “best for” conclusions when they are specific. One product can be best for simple controls and another best for compact carry without contradiction.

The comparison table is most useful when the prose explains the size of the difference. A tiny edge and a major advantage should not look identical.

Agreed. The conclusion should tell you whether the difference changes the experience or is just technically measurable.